Sunday, May 31, 2015

The "Anarchy" of Patrick Henry


"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their  rulers may be concealed from them."  Patrick Henry
Henry's quote above and comments below beg the question: Why do we even need "rulers" over us? How can any "government" be anything other than the domination of a minority over the majority, held in place by the threat and use of Force? Force is immoral as well as the perpetual enemy of Freedom. History proves it has never been any other way. Only enemies of Freedom support "government" and its use of aggressive force against the individual. 
Don't take my word for it. Read the plain language of Patrick Henry, speaking at Virginia's Constitution Ratifying Convention - June 5, 1788. You might be amazed at his prescience.


 Your President may easily become king. Your Senate is so imperfectly constructed that your dearest rights may be sacrificed by what may be a small minority; and a very small minority may continue forever unchangeably this government,  although horridly defective. Where are your checks in this government? Your strongholds will be in the hands of your enemies. It is on a supposition that your American governors shall be honest, that all the good qualities of this government are founded; but its defective and imperfect construction puts it in their power to perpetrate the worst of mischiefs, should they be bad men; and, sir, would not all the world, from the eastern to the western hemisphere, blame our distracted folly in resting our rights upon the contingency of our rulers being good or bad? 

Show me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty! I say that the loss of that dearest privilege has ever followed, with absolute certainty, every such mad attempt.

If your American chief be a man of ambition and abilities, how easy is it for him to render himself absolute! The army is in his hands, and if he be a man of address, it will be attached to him, and it will be the subject of long meditation with him to seize the first auspicious moment to accomplish his design; and, sir, will the American spirit solely relieve you when this happens? 

I would rather infinitely — and I am sure most of this Convention are of the same opinion — have a king, lords, and commons, than a government so replete with such insupportable evils. If we make a king, we may prescribe the rules by which he shall rule his people, and interpose such checks as shall prevent him from infringing them; but the President, in the field, at the head of his army, can prescribe the terms on which he shall reign master, so far that it will puzzle any American ever to get his neck from under the galling yoke.

 I cannot with patience think of this idea. If ever he violates the laws, one of two things will happen: he will come at the head of his army, to carry every thing before him; or he will give bail, or do what Mr. Chief Justice will order him.

 If he be guilty, will not the recollection of his crimes teach him to make one bold push for the American throne? 

Will not the immense difference between being master of every thing, and being ignominiously tried and punished, powerfully excite him to make this bold push? 

But, sir, where is the existing force to punish him? Can he not, at the head of his army, beat down every opposition? Away with your President! we shall have a king: the army will salute him monarch: your militia will leave you, and assist in making him king, and fight against you: and what have you to oppose this force? What will then become of you and your rights? Will not absolute despotism ensue?

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Thought for a Day

"Government authority is imposed with physical fear, religious authority through mental fear.
Since both are unable to use reason,  they threaten a jail cell or hell.
It's personal, pompous, egotistical, arrogant authoritarianism by politicians and priest."

Monday, May 11, 2015

STAY QUIET AND YOU’LL BE OKAY!

Free speech is necessary to free society for all the stuff after the “but”, after the “however”. There’s no fine line between “free speech” and “hate speech”: Free speech is hate speech; it’s for the speech you hate – and for all your speech that the other guy hates. . . .

Click here

Friday, May 8, 2015

It was anarchy in action.

"According to U.S. Marshal Dee Harkey, the reality of the old West was order without law, society without state. It was anarchy in action."